Wi-Fi Facts and Figures

Here at Geekabit we just love to talk about wifi. Bad wi-fi, good wi-fi and where there is access to free wi-fi that you just would not expect to find it (there is wi-fi in some graveyards in the States…honestly), but this week we got thinking about public wi-fi right here in the UK. Research released recently has shown that the UK now has at least 1 public wi-fi spot for every 11 people… Pretty impressive growth considering the Office for National Statistics conducted a survey in 2011 which stated that 4.9 million people connected to the internet through wifi hotspots – there are now over 5 million BT hotspots in the UK – let alone from other providers!

Global hotspot numbers are expected to reach more than 340 million over the next three years, which (accounting for population growth) is the equivalent of 1 wi-fi hotspot for every 20 people on the planet. But the distribution will not be equal, of course – in the States this is thought to be 1 hotspot for every 4 people, in African states the average would be 1 for every 408.

A quick read of an online report from the BBC in 2011 on the proliferation of wi-fi in public places reminds us how far businesses have come, as we are reminded that The Cloud offered free wi fi in restaurants such as Pizza Express and Pret A Manger, but only when you were eating a full meal – no wi fi for those dropping in for a coffee! Progress has been made, and most places offer free wi fi to all customers, but those who have the most fans are the companies with the most straightforward log-in process… who wants to be faffing with too many details and passwords?

We end today’s mini round-up of wi-fi facts with a quote from the digital advisor to Boris Jonson in 2011 “Wi-fi is not something we would put money into. We put money into things with a direct application to public service, like transport.” No wonder private companies such as BT and Google are pioneering free wi-fi hotspots to the masses!

The disappointment of Wi-Fi

There’s nothing quite like turning up to a coffee shop, ready to work and having a tight deadline that really requires the internet.

You see the sign “Free Wi-fi here” and you’re given the password, and then…massive fail later, there is no internet.

Increasingly, the provision of free wi-fi is not just the only criteria in selecting a coffee shop, pub or restaurant, but the quality, speed and reliability of the service makes a huge impact too.

Many coffee shop owners turn against those with laptops, i.e. business users with the ability to continue to spend when other consumers won’t have the funds, but I think this is a very short-term way of thinking.

When we’re on the road, we all know that we rock up to any McDonalds, Starbucks or JD Wetherspoon’s and the internet will be there, working and at a very acceptable speed.

Their investment to do this per site is minimal, and the same service is completely accessibly to smaller businesses and brands.

I’m writing this from a coffee shop where I had several important emails to write, but because I can’t due to their broadband issues, I thought I better draft some blog posts to post when I do have the internet.

My experience today echos that of so many people who have the ability to provide extra custom to a venue on a regular basis if the basic needs of today’s modern mobile worker are thought of.

We are getting there in the UK, but only by forcing us into the national brands. It’s time for our local independents to really get on board with good connectivity, the same way that a lot of Europe has embraced it.

Recently, a visit to Paris showed how bad a lot of the national chains are in providing free wi-fi, but how responsive the independents are to this change. Luckily, there’s a good network of Government provided free wi-fi spots to counter this, which makes finding a connection in the city a lot easier.

Investment in good quality products and then you can honour your promises and continue to drive your revenue upwards.

Yours, Disconnected

Pesky fairy lights may interfere with your wi-fi!

The Christmas decorations have gone up at our Winchester HQ ready for the festive season, dragging a tree in a slightly muddy pot indoors and festooning it with colourful lights and baubles. But could our newest addition to the office slow down our precious Wi-Fi…?

Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, has warned that Christmas lights could cause interference within home networks if they are not set up correctly. The story was released to publicise the release of their new Wi-Fi checker app, but the advice should not be written off by cynical scrooges as PR waffle, as Wi-Fi interference is something that the majority of the public are not aware.

Here at Geekabit we are well versed in the ordinary household items that can interrupt the proper function of a wireless router and slow internet speeds – microwaves, baby monitors and Bluetooth devices are all on the ‘naughty list’, but fairy lights..? Well, any electronic device which emits radio waves can affect Wi-Fi transmission so we would advise a quick check of the area around your router to see if there is a way you can rearrange electronic devices or remove them completely. Many people have their home router plugged into a corner of their living room, so perhaps check that the fairy lights have not gone into the same corner!

Given that broadband and mobile services are now seen as ‘essential’ to our wellbeing alongside gas water and electricity, and perhaps to keep the peace in a busy family household or office over Christmas, this is time well spent.

Merry Christmas from the Geekabit team!

Free Wi-Fi for everyone in New York City?

We were interested to read about an ambitious plan called LinkNYC, which aims to roll out free wi-fi and domestic telephone calls to residents and visitors to New York City. The plan, which is a partnership between public officials and a company called CityBridge, will be free to access and not cost the general public anything extra in taxes. It is claimed that targeted advertising will raise $500 million in revenue over the first 12 years, which will pay for the infrastructure and maintenance of the networks and be channeled back into NYC , as well as provide revenue for CityBridge.

The problem that has emerged with LinkNYC is a common one when private companies who (quite rightly) need to make a profit, become involved with community issues. The network is being launched as a three-tier system, where busy and well off parts of New York such as Manhatten, will have super fast (think around 100Mbps download speed) wi-fi that is easy to access from within apartments and homes. The kiosks in other neighborhoods, such as Brooklyn and the Bronx, will be spaced further apart, have slower download speeds and the signal is unlikely to come close to covering all the homes in between them.

As LinkNYC will be funded by advertising, it makes sense that CityBridge have focused first on ensuring the best wi-fi service and access to those who demographically have the most to spend – including tourists. But as one of the main aims of the project when it was announced by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, was to provide accessible and free wifi to all New Yorkers, has this project highlighted the digital divide between the ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’, rather than helping to bridge it?

Wi-fi facts for Hampshire businesses

Fun Fact 1:

Signals don’t actually interfere with each other

If you have 2 signals on the same frequency and they hit each other they don’t actually interfere with each other. The “Interference” that is referred to is actually the result of a receiving radio hearing multiple signals at the same time which of course can confuse it, but is not the result of the signals effecting each other. A great example is point to point links where you can have 2 links crossing each other, but not causing problems as although they cross paths, the receiving radios will not receive both signals.

Fun Fact 2:

If 2 signals are received at once, they cause a collision

This is not always the case. If there is enough of a Signal Strength difference than the lower strength signal can be viewed as noise by some vendors so that it doesn’t effect the hight strength signal. This is no different to designing a network and inspecting the background noise and allowing for a reasonable SNR (Signal to noise ratio).

RF wi-fi interference

If an internet worm got through your computer network firewall and was using around 50% of your corporate or office bandwidth as it spread from machine to machine, would you consider that a security risk or a performance problem?

Anything that impacts mission-critical corporate IT systems is a security concern. As your business Wi-Fi network becomes more and more mission-critical, any possible interference device, whether the interference is malicious, as in the case of a jammer, or accidental, must be viewed as a potential security issue.

In addition to RF denial of service, there are several other risks related to non-Wi-Fi RF devices, including:

Multi-protocol devices.
Wi-Fi networks are typically locked down with secure access controls, but devices that run on non-Wi-Fi networks, such as Bluetooth devices, are not. A notebook, computer with wi-fi and Bluetooth connectivity may act as a bridge, allowing an intruding device onto the business WAN or LAN.

Non wi-fi rogues.
Most enterprises implement a form of wi-fi rogue access point detection to find unauthorised and unsecured access points on the corporate network. But there are non-wi-fi devices such as Bluetooth access points that can open up a similar security hole. Like wi-fi rogues, these devices must be detected and eliminated.

Leakage of sensitive data
Certain non-wi-fi devices such as cameras and cordless phones can be used to carry sensitive data out of a restricted area, bypassing security policies. When this is a concern, a zone of restricted wireless operation should be established, and that zone should be enforced through monitoring of the spectrum.

RF security doesn’t just stop with wi-fi. Do you know who is using your spectrum?

Wi-fi interference – the internet thief!

If you’ve been keeping up to date with our blogs on wi-fi interference, you could be forgiven for thinking we are making a bit of a fuss and racket about not a lot, and that simply banishing the office microwave and ditching Bluetooth headsets would solve the problem. You would be wrong – there are many wireless products that operate within the unlicensed band and are likely to be within your network. These include watches, shoes, MP3 payers and countless other minute consumer devices and products. Your security solution, whilst working very well at keeping out burglers, could well be causing network jamming levels of interference.

The level of interference caused by some of these devices can be estimated by assessing the following:

1. The output power – the greater this is, the larger zone of interference the device will create.

2. The time signals are emitted for – some devices constantly output a signal (older cordless telephones), others send intermittent signals (new digital cordless telephones). Unsurprisingly, the more time a device emits a signal, the greater the interference.

3. The signal frequency – some devices operate on one frequency and will affect specific channels, others hop frequency and will impact all channels a little bit, and finally some sweep across the frequency spectrum and will cause serious interruptions on many frequencies.

In a recent study, and analogue telephone and a video camera, placed 25 feet away from the AP caused the network to collapse completely… definitely a problem!

Wi-fi interference – facts and solutions

It is tempting to ignore interference, and many network users begin accept a sluggish network. But this will have a long term impact on the productivity of your business, so it is worth assessing how often wifi interference occurs, and its impact. Several reports from technicians working for a major wifi infrastructure companies showed that interference from around 20 devices in a business were causing 50% of the problems their network was experiencing. In a residential environment, it is reported that 67% of problems were caused by interference. So it can be concluded that interference is an issue that needs addressing.

Understanding the radio frequencies that wifi networks run on is key to managing interference, and this may take a little patience – but help is at hand, if you need it. Tools are available that will classify the sources in interference on your network and make RF easier to understand. Once the sources have been identified, they can be removed from the network.

How to remove (or move) the offending source of the interference is key – you could replace a microwave or cordless headset with different models that operate outside the radio frequency band. If the source of the interference is an integral to the business as the wifi network, you could try moving the affected access point or changing its operating channel so that it is different to the interfering device and therefore unaffected. Finally, you can try to shield the problem, so that the equipment that causes the RF interference is isolated to a particular room, well away from access points, or shielded with foils or insulating foams in the walls.

Packet sniffers, wireless policies

So what are the best ways to analyse and protect your wireless network from inference – the aim being to keep it in tip top shape, and performing to the best of its abilities.

Some businesses, keen to limit interference on their network, have brought in wireless policies to tackle interference caused by employees or visitors bringing wireless devices into the building. This is a good idea, and will have a positive impact on the level of interference suffered, but does not tackle problems caused by devices found in the office already – some of which might be vital to the business operation (i.e. those cordless telephones and the lunchtime microwave!).

So what about packet sniffers? You can find free software with a quick search online, which will interface with an 802.11 client card and passively capture (‘sniff’) 802.11 transmissions within your wireless WLAN. They will assess and feedback data on secondary indicators of interference, such as increased retransmission and lower data rates, but they won’t help you determine the cause of the inference or tell you where it is located. Given that in order to get rid of interference you would hope to identify the source of the problem and then decide if you want to remove it, this is a major problem and renders packet sniffers slightly impotent.

So what next for your limping, interference addled network? Could you move it to run at 5GHz, as most devices run on 2.4GHz, thus removing most of the problem without having to actually remove the devices causing it? This might bring short-term gain and some improvement, but more and more devices, including some of those omnipresent cordless telephones, are operating at 5GHz, and many more devices will follow. Then you will be back to square one, still hamstrung by interference, and still trying to address the problem.

Wi-fi interference – I’ve done a sweep…so I must be fine?

Last time we covered how your network might be affect by interference even if it appears to be working well, and what can cause this interference – this time around we are starting to look at how you can assess your problem, and how to deal with it.

It is prudent to sweep your network for wi-fi interference, and one can be forgiven for thinking a walk around your business taking measurements of your network’s capacity would be sufficient. We would recommend a little more care is taken, and that an initial sweep should be carried out for an extended time, and repeated at different times of the day on different days. This is because the interference will be intermittent, due to the varying causes already discussed.  Even periodic sweeping will not guarantee an interference free network (but should help you to assess how much of a problem you may have), so what else can be done?

Some newer to market switch-based WLAN infrastructure products have interference management technology that detects the presence of non-802.11 signals, and changes the channel of the access points in the area. This is helpful, but will not solve problems with broadband based devices such as cordless phones and Bluetooth devices. So the problem will still need addressing…

There is a school of thought that suggests if you stick an access point in each room of your network, you can overcome interference simply because the network is spread out. Sadly this is not the case, as the access points may begin to cause interference to each other… somewhat negating the point of having lots of them!

Next time we will look at how a wireless policy in your business might work, packet sniffers and other wi-fi interference geekery – don’t miss it. At some point we promise to tell you what will work to stop interference in your network!