Digital Detox Destinations

Our Director, Steve, has recently got married and has just got back from his honeymoon – A celebration of his nuptials but also a much needed break from the digital demands of his world. While I (and probably his new wife, too) insisted that he switched off whilst he was away, I wouldn’t be surprised if he had the odd sneaky peek at emails just to make sure that we were ticking over okay.

Which got me to thinking… Is there anywhere left in this world that forces you to have a proper digital detox?

As Brits, we have what can only be described as an addiction to the internet. Any moment we stop and sit down like waiting for a train or a bus, you’ll find heads pointed down at brightly lit screens, eyes devouring the media on the screen. A lot of times, they don’t even need to sit down!

We go to the pub to catch up with friends in person, see each other face to face, but still pull out our phones and ask ‘What’s the Wi-Fi password?’

A staggering 99% of young Brits (16 to 35 years old) use the internet (who are the other 1%? What do they do with their time?). What’s even more staggering is that these internet users are consuming media online for 10 hours per day, with the majority being viewed through a smartphone or tablet.

So it would seem that Britain really could be in need of a Digital Detox, and somewhere where it’s not left merely to willpower alone. With an internet addiction like this, there really is no other way than Cold Turkey (not one of the destinations, I’m afraid…)

Akamai, content delivery network and cloud services provider, have compiled a list of countries that would fit the bill.

Due to a lack of infrastructure, these 35 countries have a user penetration rate of less than 20% – This means that only 1 in 5 of the residents of these countries can access the internet.

1. Guatemala
2. Honduras
3. Nicaragua
4. El Salvador
5. Senegal
6. Burkina Faso
7. Mali
8. Ghana
9. Cote d’Ivoire
10. Benin
11. Algeria
12. Libya
13. Sudan
14. Eritrea
15. Ethiopia
16. Cameroon
17. Uganda
18. Rwanda
19. D.R. Congo
20. Malawi
21. Zimbabwe
22. Zambia
23. Namibia
24. Madagascar
25. Mozambique
26. Angola
27. Yemen
28. Pakistan
29. Turkmenistan
30. Nepal
31. India
32. Bangladesh
33. Sri Lanka
34. Myanmar
35. Indonesia

Obviously, there are some countries on this list that it’s not possible to visit due to the foreign office advising against travel to certain places because of civil unrest, war and poverty. Obviously these reasons also impact why internet usage is so low.

However, there are countries on this list that are the perfect retreat for a bit of solitude and well worth a trip. Telegraph Travel pinpointed some of them earlier this year, including a beach holiday in Nicaragua, a walking holiday through the Himalayan foothills of Ladakh, India, and a three-day trek from Kalaw to Inle Lake in Myanmar.

You could also do some lemur spotting in Madagascar, hop between islands in Indonesia, visit the rock-hewn churches of Ethipoa, track down the breathtaking sight of mountain gorillas in the DRC, or explore the utterly desolate coastline and desert of Namibia. They might be the most photogenic of opportunities, but you won’t be posting those pictures on Instagram until your feet are back on British soil.

There are plenty more incredible travel destinations on this list too like Guatemala, Senegal, Malawi, Mozambique, Turkmenistan, Sri Lanka and Nepal.

This list is of course not definitive, and there will be other internet-free places just as worthy of a holiday to satisfy the needs of a detox from digital life. You might want to scream from the top of the Facebook mountains about meeting Kazakh eagle hunters but you’ll be far from towns, roads and mobile reception in the real-life Altai Mountains. (The reason this one didn’t make the list is due to most of the population living in Ulaanbaatar which has excellent connectivity).

Other areas off the beaten track and away from the pulls of digital media could be Russia’s far east where you’re more likely to meet a bear than a person, Chilean Patagonia, the USA’s largest protected area Wrangell-St Elias National Park in Alaska, and The Yukon in Canada which is 80 per cent Wi-Fi-free.

Shockingly, Steve didn’t choose any of these destinations for his honeymoon… I can’t think why?

 

For more information on the last places on Earth with no internet, and where we found this list of countries, head to The Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/lists/the-last-places-on-earth-with-no-internet/

With thanks to https://www.iconspng.com/image/56627/no-wifi-here-quiet-zone for the image.

Should Venues Provide Free Wi-Fi?

Should UK venues offer free Wi-Fi to delegates and visitors? The debate is a fierce one and not showing any signs of diminishing. ESSA (Event Supplier Services Association) and ABPCO (Association of British Professional Conference Organisers) have widely campaigned the issue with differing views.

Below you’ll find a ‘Question Time’ style discussion between the Chairs of both associations – John Robson for ESSA and Michael Foreman for ABPCO. Or skip to the end for a conclusion of their points.

 

Just how important do you see the provision of Wi- Fi to be within a venue, to ensure the success of an event, be that a conference, show or exhibition?

Robson: It is absolutely essential these days. We are becoming increasingly dependent upon connectivity to run our personal and business lives and this does not stop when we enter an event or venue.

Foreman: A recent ABPCO debate with venues, conference organisers and suppliers highlighted that Wi-Fi is increasingly becoming the lifeblood of events. Provision of Wi-Fi has moved from becoming a “luxury” item to a fundamental utility, in a similar way to light and heating – this is where the venues need to review their provision. Not only do delegates need to access basic communications such as emails and social media, but increasingly Wi-Fi is required for delegates to participate in the conference content, such as voting, Twitter Q&A and downloading applications.

What level of guaranteed service do you believe should be available to organisers, delegates, exhibitors and visitors at an event?

Robson: Simply put, if you need a specific level of connectivity then you should plan for it. It could be a basic level that allows all types of user to collect/reply to email as attending an exhibition or conference is no longer seen as a day out of the office but part of a working day and the expectation is that it will be business as usual. However, anyone requiring guaranteed connectivity (e.g. for download/upload, presentations etc.) should plan for and purchase the appropriate level of service, as the very nature of Wi-Fi means that it is subject to interference and packet loss unless delivered appropriately. It’s the same analogy as relying on a 3G connection from a mobile operator in a busy location – you expect it most of the time but you would choose to use an alternative source of Internet connectivity if your life depended on it.

Foreman: With regard to the provision of free Wi-Fi for conference delegates, which is what ABPCO’s Conference Cloud campaign focuses on, participants at our recent debate agreed that there is a need for “basic” free Wi-Fi. What “basic” constitutes will vary slightly for each venue, but they do need to be clear about what the offer is at that basic level (bandwidth and how many users can access simultaneously etc). The suggestion at our debate was that it should provide access to email and social media, also possibly accessing tools like Dropbox, but that it would be acceptable to charge for a more sophisticated and high bandwidth usage, such as video.

Where would you like to see Wi-Fi available at an event – in the lobby, networking area or within the conference/show?

Robson: There is no reason why it should not be available everywhere including within conference areas. The availability should represent the needs of the event. For example, these days many events are interactive and people tweet constantly during and after seminar sessions and keynotes. On the counter side, some organisers would prefer not to have this distraction during the presentations. Often mobile signals are weak or unavailable, so Wi-Fi should be available to enable other communications such as using an event specific app or Twitter.

Foreman: One of the benefits of providing free Wi-Fi at a venue is to avoid delegates disappearing at intervals to somewhere that does offer it (whether outside in the street as I witnessed in the USA or a local Starbucks). The networking element is hugely important in events, so we would anticipate Wi-Fi being available in networking areas in addition to the main auditorium to participate in applications such as live voting.

To ensure fair access, would you be comfortable to have a third party supplier or the venue manage and control access to Wi-Fi and have the ability to shut down any non-authorised access?

Robson: If shutting down unauthorized activity improves the service and makes for a better experience for all, then yes, third party suppliers and venues should have this control. They will have a much better understanding of Wi-Fi than most event organisers and can use this to ensure that the delegates, exhibitors and visitors all have the required level of service. Education is key; it looks simple, but it isn’t and technology alone cannot guarantee connectivity. Control measures are absolutely essential and third party suppliers and venues should have the power to shut down unauthorised access.

Foreman: I don’t think it is relevant as long as the delegate does not have to pay. The way that venues set up their network is up to them. We would like to see a system in place where either basic Wi-Fi is offered free or the organiser has the ability to fund this basic option (through sponsorship or other methods) with an upgrade on demand.

Can the available technology satisfy the demands?

Robson: Yes it can but it’s not enough to simply provide a network. The Wi-Fi provider needs to work closely with the organiser to work out what those demands are and where the pinch points lie, so that additional infrastructure can be deployed if necessary. In addition to active planning, active management needs to be applied to ensure that rogue networks and rogue devices are shutdown to minimize interference and maximise up time. It’s worth noting that the technology is available to provide acceptable levels of Wi-Fi connectivity but don’t be fooled into thinking that because a venue claims to have a good Wi-Fi network that it’s using the latest technologies or that it is adequate for every event. Event organisers must ask specific questions when choosing a venue about how many people they want to connect concurrently and what sort of experience (i.e. bandwidth) each user can expect, especially in areas where large numbers of people will gather e.g. lobby areas, cafés etc.

Foreman: We learned during our debate that there is a lot of legacy infrastructure in situ at many venues that is not currently equipped to deal with the bandwidth demands. This is a big part of the discussion for many venues, as there is a cost to invest in upgrading their systems to offer greater functionality and service levels to professional conference organisers and their clients. What we explored at our debate was a number of initiatives, highlighted by Cisco, which can assist with cost covering through sponsorship and other marketing initiatives.

Be it a permanent or temporary supply of Wi-Fi, if there is a cost to deliver a robust and accessible service within a venue, who should carry the cost – the venue, an event organiser or the visitor?

Robson: This is a commercial arrangement between the organiser and the venues. This is not about whether the Wi-Fi should be free or not. The hardware, the continual upgrading of the hardware to meet the ever increasing demand and the management of the Internet and the Wi-Fi for each event costs a lot of money and has to be funded. If it’s provided free to visitors then one way or another the event organiser will pay for it. This might be a direct cost; a cost bundled within the price for the space, or a sponsorship of the Wi-Fi perhaps via landing page advert or a video that each user sees when they connect to the Wi-Fi network.

Foreman: As consumers we are increasingly benefitting from high-speed Wi-Fi access on multiple devices and our expectations are changing. Wi-Fi is seen as much more of a basic utility than previously and delegates should not see a separate Wi-Fi charge for logging in to basic access (checking emails, social media etc) when they attend a conference. Whether the venue covers the cost for this basic level in its room hire is up to the venue, but the delegates certainly should not pay. What is required is much greater clarification on what can be offered at a basic level and what will be required for more sophisticated, high-bandwidth usage. We are working on a document highlighting the questions that professional conference organisers need to be asking their clients about their Wi-Fi requirements and what venues need to be clear on. That way we will all have greater transparency and understanding about when there is more to pay for a complex requirement.

What do you see as the next step in the process of attaining solid Wi-Fi connectivity at events?

Robson: New infrastructure in venues that can operate on both the 2.4ghz and the 5ghz bands. More devices in the marketplace capable of operating on 5ghz band and an acceptance from the organiser and the venues that the Wi-Fi has to be actively planned and managed pre and during the event. Also, people need to be pro-active and aware and to keep abreast of technological developments and the impacts they may have.

Foreman: Education and understanding between venues, conference organisers and their clients is the key to moving forward. We are working on an outline document, which will provide organisers with some guidance on what questions they need to be asking. We will also be continuing with our Conference Cloud campaign and encouraging venues to sign up and offer free Wi-Fi to delegates. We have over 130 venue sites listed across the UK already and we receive more requests to join each week.

 

Conclusions:

Both associations agree that Wi-Fi is now a crucial part of any type of event. People depend on being able to connect for both personal and business reasons, thus, venues need to be able to provide that connectivity.

Fundamentally, whatever level of connectivity required by an event organiser must be planned for so that the basic level of service meets expectations. The definition of ‘basic’ will differ, so each venue must be transparent about what exactly is being offered. But what, if any service, should be free? Should a ‘basic’ level of service be free, with the opportunity to then purchase a higher level? Or should all levels of service be purchased to meet the event organisers exact needs?

It seems a unanimous agreement that Wi-Fi should be available anywhere and everywhere at an event venue. The pros to having Wi-Fi available to delegates throughout the venue (ability to participate in interactive seminars, live tweeting, avoiding absconding) outweigh the cons (potential distraction during presentations).

It is acceptable for third party suppliers or venues to be able to manage and control Wi-Fi access, including shut downs, as long as it is to ensure excellent service and delegates are not paying for that service.

The technology is there, but careful planning must be carried out when researching venues with detailed questions being asked about the service level required. While there is the technology to meet specifications, it is not a given that venues will have the necessary systems in place.

The provisions that need to be in place in order to provide Wi-Fi cost a lot of money, and continually have to be updated. It seems that it would not be possible for a venue to completely swallow this cost and offer free Wi-Fi for all. The cost is inevitably knitted into overall costs e.g. room hire or day delegate rate or passed down to the end user. The general consensus is that the delegate should not be paying for it, and either the venue organiser needs to be covering the costs, or a sponsor who utilises the landing page for marketing purposes.

The next steps to attain solid Wi-Fi connectivity at events are; venues operating on both 2ghz and 5ghz bands, proactive planning and management before and after the event from planners and venues, technological education so there is clear understanding between parties, and finding a way to offer delegates free Wi-Fi e.g. through ACBPO’s Conference Cloud campaign.

 

Here at Geekabit, we provide a comprehensive Wi-Fi service for businesses, venues and events – For more information head to our website https://geekabit.co.uk/what-we-do/

You can also contact us on any of the below; We serve clients across Europe from our offices based in Hampshire and London.
Contact us: London 0203 322 2443 | Cardiff: 02920 676 712 | Winchester: 01962 657 390 | [email protected]

Cardiff Wi-Fi Help in South Wales

We are Geekabit and we provide Wi-Fi help in South Wales from our offices in Cardiff.

We support business Wi-Fi helping to fix broken Wi-Fi in South Wales, for businesses that are suffering from issues which may be causing their business to slow down – through dropped connections, misfunctioning VOIP telephony, slow internet speeds and Wi-Fi issues at different times of day.

We work with organisations across South Wales, including offices, manufacturers, warehousing and hotels where there are Wi-Fi issues.

Why work with us?
Whilst there are a number of companies – such as electricians, old BT phone engineers and a variety of small residential computer companies, when you have a true Wi-Fi issue in your business, it is time to call in the Wales’ specialist Wi-Fi Consultants.

Using our skills, extensive field experience and Wi-Fi qualifications, we have the ability to quickly diagnose and fix the Wi-Fi issues at your workplace, and will work with your IT teams in order to provide a resolution. Indeed, we often just diagnose the issues and provide advice to your existing suppliers on how to fix it themselves – we’re flexible.

Wi-Fi for Events in Wales
We provide event hire for Wi-Fi and Mobile Broadband for events in Wales from Cardiff. With the growing field of social media marketing, there is a need for attendees to immediately check in, share video and post on their feeds showing what they are up to.
In often rural areas, we have the skills and equipment for Wi-Fi event hire for large numbers of guests, helping to provide a solid internet reliable internet connection.

We also do this for press conferences, concerts, festivals and sporting events in Wales.

Planning a Wi-Fi network in Wales?
Our Welsh Wi-Fi Planning and Design service offers you the chance to ensure full network coverage for your users, look at the future capacity of your network and support your installation team in specifying the right equipment.

Using a consultative approach, we work with your IT teams, end users, facilities management and construction teams to understand the requirements of your future installation and perform site visits to plan the most future-proofed Wi-Fi network for your business in Wales.

We use the latest software to build predictive models of your future Wi-Fi network, whether your building exists or not, helping you to ensure a perfect Wi-Fi network that saves time and money.

Wales Wi-Fi Provider for Wi-Fi Installs
We won’t lie – anyone can install a box on the ceiling and plug it in. But installing a successful Wi-Fi network requires a great deal more thought and expertise.

But do you have the experience to recognise the exact positioning of Wi-Fi access points and network cables can have a huge impact on your network coverage, speed and capacity?

We visit many sites throughout Wales from our Cardiff office, where the main signal is pointed in the opposite direction of the users, interrupted by metal ceilings or access points are dangling from their own power cables. Many IT companies in Wales do not have the daily experience of bad Wi-Fi to understand what they are doing is often damaging the very problem they were there to fix.

Contact Wales Wi-Fi Experts
If you need assistance installing, fixing, extending or hiring business Wi-Fi networks in Wales, our team of Cardiff-based Wi-Fi experts is here to support you. You can email [email protected] or call 02920 676712.

The Farce of Broadband Advertising and better ‘Wi-Fi’ boxes

Recently there has been a massive increase in the TV, Radio and Online advertisements from Broadband providers saying they’ve got the best Wi-Fi.

Indeed, they might have the most strongest signal they’ve ever had, claim to reach further in your house than they previously did or cover an entire mansion. But they are misleading people significantly into thinking that by swapping broadband provider, they will solve the Wi-Fi issues in their house.

We’ve seen this with a number of clients recently, tricked into changing their provider, and lo and behold, they are still suffering the same issues. They go away thinking that by changing provider, often locking themselves into 18 month contracts, that all their problems will be solved by a shiny new box.

Indeed advertising watchdogs have found that companies such as BT shouldn’t be doing this (click here for the link).

What will it do?
For anyone suffering with Wi-Fi issues, changing your broadband provider will mainly only help if the issue is with your broadband.
There’s already enough confusion over whether it’s your broadband or your Wi-Fi that’s the problem, with many users getting confused by both these terms. The advertising for the broadband industry does nothing to help this.

What’s the problem then?
Often the problem has nothing to do with their broadband, it is more likely to do with the wireless environment that the router sits in.
Wrong placement in the house, people not manually setting up the Wi-Fi from the broadband router, expecting it to be like the adverts and to have a great signal around a property the size of Buckingham Place – it just doesn’t happen.

If the true problem is Wi-Fi, I’m afraid the solution is to fix the Wi-Fi issue at hand. Changing a box for another one with a lot of false marketing promises, that won’t do the trick. But by the time you’re signed into another 18 months, that’s when you’ll realise.

What can I do about it?
There’s lots of advice across this site that explains how to make the Wi-Fi better, and we are pleased to be able to offer this as one of our core services. By using technical industry software, we can provide on-site Wi-Fi Site Surveys that help to diagnose your issues.

Please contact our team by emailing [email protected] or by calling one of our offices.

Access Points: New colours and skins | Advantages

Ubiquiti | New Colour Range and Finishes

Back in the days, Access Points (AP) used to be blunt and boring since you were limited to the white colour only. However, you can forget those days as Ubiquity is going to soon release their new range of colours and skins for the new UniFi nanoHD AP.

The Ubiquiti UniFi nanoHD AP features simultaneous, dual-band, 4×4 MU-MIMO technology and convenient 802.3af PoE compatibility. The compact design delivers a cost-effective combination of value and performance.

There are literally hundreds and hundreds of AC certified devices being used today, and all of them can benefit from the deployment of wave 2 AC access points. The nanoHD AP features the latest in Wi-Fi 802.11ac Wave 2 MU-MIMO technology.

Apart from speed, there are 3 main features that separate wave 2 APs from its wave 1 predecessor:

  • MU-MIMO
  • 4 spatial or data streams
  • 160 MHz channels

What does this mean for your business?

With the right design in place, wave 2 access points can offer better performance using fewer APs, which helps boost productivity, efficiency and user satisfaction rates.

We’ve had lots of clients who asked about having an oak coloured access point, and we’ve always felt sorry to let them know it was not possible. But now thanks to Ubiquiti’s new range of colours and skins, they allow the UniFi nanoHD AP to blend into its surroundings.

Access Points | Better for Businesses

While range extenders are great for home Wi-Fi networks, they’re not efficient for modern businesses. This is because they can only support a limited number of devices at one time, usually no more than 20. While range extenders do increase the coverage of a Wi-Fi router, they do not increase its available bandwidth. Depending on the number of devices you have connected simultaneously, a range extender could end up weighing down your connection.

Access points, on the other hand, can handle over 60 simultaneous connections each. By installing access points throughout the office, users can roam freely from room to room without experiencing network interruptions. As they move through the building, their devices shift seamlessly from one access point to the next without dropping the connection—they will not even realize they are switching between networks.

Advantages of Using Wireless Access Points

When you have both employees and guests connecting with desktops, laptops, mobile phones, and tablets, 20 devices on a wireless network adds up quickly. At 60 simultaneous connections each, access points give you the freedom to scale the number of devices supported on your network. But that’s only one of the advantages of using these network enhancers—consider these points:

  • Business-grade access points can be installed anywhere you can run an Ethernet cable. Newer models are also compatible with Power over Ethernet Plus, or PoE+ (a combination Ethernet and power cord), so there is no need to run a separate power line or install an outlet near the access point.
  • Additional standard features include Captive Portal and Access Control List (ACL) support, so you can limit guest access without compromising network security, as well as easily manage users within your Wi-Fi network.
  • Select access points include a Clustering feature – a single point from which the IT administrator can view, deploy, configure, and secure a Wi-Fi network as a single entity rather than a series of separate access point configurations.

Thanks to 4gon for the image.

Is 2.4GHz dying? Will 5GHz become a better option?

Do the terms ‘802.11ac’, ‘Wave 2’ and ‘5GHz’ sound familiar? They are often associated with shiny new phones and Access Points. Conversely, ‘2.4GHz’ may invoke images of old barcode scanners and legacy home routers. Is this a fair perception?

It’s been apparent for a couple of years that the 2.4GHz band of Wi-Fi is getting more crowded. Allowing users to share this spectrum at the same time is the thing that made it so useful, but at the moment, the same feature unfortunately starts to make the spectrum unusable in several situations.

In 2016, Apple and Cisco issued a paper in regards to the best network practices for enterprises where they stated that the use of 2.4GHz band is not considered suitable for business and/or mission critical enterprise applications. They also suggested to businesses to change to 5GHz band and replace the 2.4GHz.

In 2014, the Wi-Fi Alliance analysed the Wi-Fi enabled devices in the world, plus the amount of selling and shipping of sales each year. The results showed that the number of new devices is going to continuously grow at a fast pace. Most of the devices sold today can work with both 2.4GHz and 5GHz spectrum, but they are set to default to use 2.4GHz spectrum. The reason behind devices being set as default to using 2.4GHz is to enable usability of these devices on older Wi-Fi routers. This unfortunately leads to creating an increasing demand in only one part of the spectrum. Hence, there is no doubt the bandwidth can get full.

What is the solution that the market has found?

Wi-Fi/802.11 started off in 1997 and it ran exclusively on 2.4GHz. Two years later, in 1999, 802.11a has launched and 5GHz became an alternative. Between 2009 and 2017, as specified above, most devices have been manufactured with 5GHz support. However, this is set to continue with 5GHz-only devices (802.11ac) which is seeing a rapid adoption rate.

Some of the devices like Amazon Alexa, Apple HomeKit, etc. connect to Wi-Fi by exclusively using 2.4GHz. This might be a sign 2.4GHz is not dying. Sadly, non-Wi-Fi equipment interfere on the 2.4GHz frequency and makes it more congested than ever before. For this reason, Wi-Fi moves towards a 5GHz-only future.

What is the difference between 2.4GHz and 5GHz?

Most of the existent devices rely on 2.4GHz connections even though they have 5GHz support. 2.4GHz connection is a shorter, denser frequency which is better for range and in case there are walls between the router and the user. Having numerous devices using the same frequency impacts the overall quality and result in dropped connection occasionally.

Changing to 5GHZ connection results in less interference and there is a stronger signal, meaning a more reliable and constant connection and faster data transfer. The drawback of 5GHz is its shorter range in comparison to 2.4GHz and has more difficulty penetrating obstacles like walls or windows.

To conclude, 2.4GHz has better range but loads of interference while 5GHz has a shorter range with less interference.

The Future

The explosion of IoT has increased the dependency on 2.4GHz and some devices are still produced to connect to 2.4GHz frequency only. Manufacturers are doing this because chipsets are cheaper and often provide better connectivity range compared to 5GHz.

As devices start to focus on supporting both frequencies (2.4GHz and 5GHz) or 5GHz-only, we could see 5GHz becoming the cheaper alternative.

To answer the question of this article, we can safely say 2.4GHz is not dead but will be soon. However, technology needs to continuously find new solutions as the 5GHz spectrum can end up in the same place 2.4GHz did, meaning that if all devices move to using 5GHz, it may also get overcrowded.

For the future, experts advise to make sure you purchase devices that support 5GHz (802.11ac). Also, SDR can improve the operational efficiency and performance of a wireless network, and can also ease the transition to 5GHz-only frequency, so it may be worth investing in.

With thanks to Aerohive for the image.
Li-Fi has been tested in the real world and it’s 100 times faster than Wi-Fi

In a world where technology evolved so much that almost everything needs an internet connection, you might ask yourself whether there will be enough bandwidth for all these devices. Will the existing system be fast enough for all the data? And most importantly, will the data be secure?

Scientists have the answer to all of these questions, through this upcoming technology called Li-Fi (Light Fidelity). This is believed to be the next generation of internet where light will be the medium for transmitting data. Yes, you read that right. The light you use in your house, with some modifications can be used to transmit data to the devices that require internet connection.

Li-Fi was invented by Harald Haas back in 2011, when he demonstrated for the first time that the light from a single flickering LED could transmit far more data than a cellular tower. Li-Fi was tested in labs and achieved speeds of up to 224 Gbps, giving this technology the potential to change everything about the way we use the Internet.

In 2015, scientists have taken Li-Fi out of the lab for the first time, trialing it in Tallinn, Estonia. The reported data transmission speed was clocked at 1 GB per second said to be 100 times faster than current average Wi-Fi speeds.

Li-Fi has also been tested in India this year. Education and Research Network (ERNET) is an autonomous scientific society under the IT Ministry. ERNET conducted a pilot test with Philips India and IIT-Madras at IIT-Madras campus, to gauge the impact and results of Li-Fi. It seems that the tests were successful, and further research is currently underway to make Li-Fi commercially viable. The pilot test was conducted a few weeks ago in controlled environment, and now, the researchers are collaborating with Indian Institute Of Science for further insights.

The technology uses Visible Light Communication (VLC). A medium that uses VLC between 400 and 800 THz. As said above, small impulses switching ON and OFF, like a torch, can be used to write and transmit data in binary code. However, do not worry about a light flickering all the time in an office or in your house, the speed at which the LEDs are switching is imperceptible to the naked eye.

Why do we need a change in the existing technology?

Since the beginning, we have been using Radio Frequency (RF) medium to transmit data wirelessly. RF uses radio waves which have a couple of drawbacks at the moment:

  • High demand for the internet that could not be met by the current method
  • Demand for higher network speed and, therefore, a need for a bigger bandwidth
  • RF medium is not safe to be used in hospitals, power plants, aeroplanes etc. and these places will also need internet connectivity to match the modern era we are in
  • RF is believed not to be safe, since your data can escape through walls and cannot be contained within a particular area

These couple of drawbacks call for a new technology – Let’s welcome Li-Fi. The benefits of Li-Fi, other than the faster speed, is that light cannot pass through walls, hence it makes it more secure, and with less interference between devices.

How does it work?

As mentioned above, Li-Fi uses light to transmit data through special modified LED lights, unlike the Wi-Fi connection that uses RF. As we know, LED is a semiconductor device and like all semiconductors it has switching properties which can be used to transmit data.

Every LED lamp is powered through a driver, this driver will get information from the Internet server and the data will be encoded in the driver. Based on this encoded data, the LED lamp will flicker at a very high speed that cannot be noticed by the human eye. The Photo Detector on the other end will be able to read all the flickering, decoding it after the Amplification and Processing of data. VLC has a frequency between 400 and 800 THz, while radio waves are just 300 GHz.

How far until we will be able to use Li-Fi?

Scientists say that Li-Fi will probably not completely replace Wi-Fi, but rather the two technologies could be used together to achieve more efficient and secure networks. Furthermore, this is also because replacing the existent Wi-Fi infrastructure with Li-Fi is not feasible. However, research teams around the world are exploring how to retrofit the devices we have at the moment to work with Li-Fi technology.

Li-Fi experts are aiming to start installing Li-Fi technology in hospitals and offer a plug-and-play application for secure wireless internet access, with a capacity of 11.5 MB/second (comparable to the first generation of Wi-Fi).

If applications like these and the trial in Estonia prove successful after further observation, we could achieve what Haas outlined back in 2011, namely the beginning of a new internet era.

 

Now, prepare to 01100101 01101110 01101010 01101111 01111001 00100000 01001100 01101001 00101101 01000110 01101001 00100000 01110011 01101111 01101111 01101110.

 

With thanks to trak.in for the image.

Common Wi-Fi Problems and How to Fix Them

Remember the days where you had to wait for someone to get off the phone so that you could connect to the internet?

We might have moved quite a way on from that, but we do still get the occasional connection problems with todays Wi-Fi.

Over recent years we’ve seen internet speeds and Wi-Fi improve massively. Wireless connections are now more reliable than they ever have been, and data speeds are faster.

Unfortunately though, that doesn’t mean there’s never an issue. I used to work from a well known coffee shop a few afternoons a week while my little boy was at pre-school and I can say first hand that Wi-Fi isn’t without issue, whether it’s slow to load or just no connection, sometimes it just doesn’t do what you want it to.

Below are the most common problems you’ll encounter with your home network internet and how you can fix them.

S L O W Connection

This is a common problem and even though the speeds reaching most homes are getting faster and faster, wireless networks can get still get bogged down. You’ll likely find that your internet connection is still working, but it’s just the speeds that are slower than normal. Luckily there is usually a completely logical explanation that is quite straightforward to fix.

Cause: The most obvious (and probably more straightforward) problem with slow Wi-Fi speeds is being physically too far away from the router. The further you and your device are from the router, the more unreliable the connection will be.
Fix: It’s pretty simple… In the words of Phyllis Nelson, moooooove closerrrrrr. Get a bit closer to the router. If it’s in a different room, then try moving into that room and see if it speeds up. If this is an issue that frequently annoys you, and stops you connecting from where you want to, then try moving the router to a better spot. Try putting it in the most centralised location possible within your home, up high, perhaps on a shelf, and away from any other devices which could cause interference. (We’ve got a few blogs which touch on interference and what to avoid when placing your router). If that doesn’t fix the problem, then you could also consider extending the reach of your network by purchasing a second router and a set of powerline network adapters.

Cause: Another potential cause of slowdowns is a lack of bandwidth. If everyone is at home and sitting scrolling through their social networks on their phone, working on their computers, and catching up with a boxset on tv, all of these data-hungry applications will be causing your typically speedy internet to be spread rather thin.
Fix: If there are any devices which aren’t actively being used, then disconnect these. If you’ve got multiple people all trying to stream videos from Netflix, and someone else trying to game online, you could try connecting one or more of their devices directly to the router using a Cat-5 ethernet cable. This would free up some of the wireless bandwidth. If that doesn’t help, then unfortunately the problem may just be that you don’t have fast enough internet speeds to support everything at once. Perhaps you could suggest a family boardgame or a walk outside instead…
There is also a sneakier possible reason for the slowness, and that’s the chance that someone nearby, perhaps a neighbour, is leeching off your Internet. This is entirely preventable – Make sure you stay on top of your setup security, always have your network password protected, and only give it out sparingly.

Cause: Interference. We’ve blogged about this issue a couple of times and it can be a real problem. If you live in a crowded area then this issue is a very real possibility, but there are ways around it. Most people leave their settings unchanged when they initially set up their internet. Default wireless frequency channels (for example 1, 6 and 11) become very over-used.
Fix: Nowadays, we as a consumer are lucky with many newer model routers being capable of automatically selecting the least crowded frequencies upon rebooting. To check this, perform a power cycle on your router. You can also change them manually by logging in to the admin panel and choosing a different channel.In addition to this, if you have a dual-band router, you could try enabling both 2.4GHz and 5GHz. You can use the 5GHz channel for your most important connections.

Cause: Unfortunately, internet speeds during peak hours can slow for everyone, especially, again, in crowded, urban areas.
Fix: The down side to this is there’s not really a great deal you can do about it. If you can try to schedule your internet usage outside of peak hours then obviously that will help, but probably not always possible.

Cause: With wireless technology changing all the time, and having improved enormously over the last decade, you’ll be forgiven for not realising that the problem is simply an outdated router. New wireless standards have been put in place, speeds are faster than ever, fiber is being offered in more areas and devices you never thought would require an Internet connection now need Wi-Fi who’d have thought you’d be connecting your lights and fridge to the internet?
Fix: If you suspect that the router may be the issue, then it might be time to raid the piggy bank and invest in a new one. Best practice is to upgrade your router about every two years and can help you avoid certain issues altogether.

 

No Internet Connection

Cause: Every now and again, there’ll be a glitch in the matrix and the router or modem (or a combination or both) just stop communicating with each other. Annoyingly, there isn’t always an explanation, it’s just one of those things.
Fix: First and foremost – Try pulling the plug. Disconnect the modem and the router from power and wait at least 30 seconds before restoring power to both. More often than not, this will sort the problem and get everyone talking again.

Cause: Another common problem is the connection dropping completely, and not due to a hardware issue or anything like that, but rather a massive service outage.
Fix: This again, is one of those things that you unfortunately can’t do much about. Head to the nearest coffee shop (hopefully not the one I previously mentioned…) or get on the phone with your Internet service provider (ISP) and tell them affected. Whilst this frustratingly won’t do a lot to speed up the recovery time and get you back online, it will help the ISP know more about which areas are affected by an outage.

Hopefully one of these fixes will have fixed your Wi-Fi issue!

 

 

With thanks to osxdaily.com for the image
Ever Wondered How In-Flight Wi-Fi Works?

We are now a world of people who always want to be online and connected. There aren’t that many places where you can go where there is absolutely no reception, no Wi-Fi, no 3G/4G, but a plane used to be one of those sacred places.

A place providing a precious few hours away from the digital realm and a break away from emails, WhatsApp notifications and all sorts of other pings. But no more.

You might have once been able to use the excuse “Sorry I didn’t reply, I was on a plane!” but in-flight Wi-Fi is now becoming an increasingly common offering – Mostly on flagship airlines but possibly the budget ones aswell.

And so you might find yourself wondering – How does in-flight Wi-Fi actually work? How can I get an internet signal when I’m 35,000 feet up in the air?

Well in simplest terms, there are 2 ways this can occur.

The first is from the ground via mobile broadband towers. The signals these sent are received by an aircrafts antennas which are usually found on the base of the main body of the plane.

Theoretically, there should be no interruptions in connectivity as the plane automatically connects and receives signals from the nearest tower as it travels through different parts of airspace. If, however, you are travelling over a large body of water or perhaps very remote terrain then this method can make connectivity an issue.

The second way to get Wi-Fi while you fly uses uses satellite technology. Satellites in geostationary orbit (35,786km above the planet) send and receive signals to earth via receivers and transmitters. These are the same satellites that are used in television signals, weather forecasting, and covert military operations. In the same way that devices on the ground can connect, so can the plane.

Your smartphone or device can then transmit information to and from the nearest satellite signal through an antenna on the top of the plane. The satellite acts as the ‘middle man’ as information is passed between the ground and the plane. Passengers can access Wi-Fi onboard the plane via a router.

As per usual, the US are a bit ahead on the whole Wi-Fi aboard your plane thing. Their infrastructure is much more developed than elsewhere in the world and so you will tend to find better (and cheaper) Wi-Fi offerings on American flights than those in Europe.

So now you know how you can get Wi-Fi on a plane, your next question might be, why is it so slow?

While technology is undoubtedly developing at a fast pace, it has strived but not quite managed to keep up with the sophistication and sheer number of Wi-Fi-guzzling devices and the demand for their use at all times.

The first onboard Wi-Fi service was launched by Gogo (previously known as Aircell) on a Virgin America plane a decade ago back in 2008. At this time, the connection was an adequate 3 Mbps, enough for the functionality of a few laptops (without the streaming of videos – that was prohibited). Here in 2018 however, every single passenger will likely have at least one device that they will want to connect to various apps, websites and multiple services which means there is a much greater strain and demand on resources.

Today you’ll likely see an offering of 12 Mbps via a satellite connection, but these are expensive to maintain and upgrade so we see this technology lagging behind too.

So whilst Gogo has a monopoly on US inflight Wi-Fi, it is been widely criticised for its painfully slow connection speeds.

In comparison to the inflight Wi-Fi speed of 12 Mbps, last year Ofcom reported that UK households enjoyed an average internet speed of 36.2 Mbps so there is rather a gap between what people are used to at home and what people get onboard their flight.

So if inflight Wi-Fi is so slow, why is it so expensive?

Both methods of technology come at a price, as do the in-aircraft systems. Not only that, but the necessary antennas also increase drag, which adds fuel costs onto the airline’s bill.

Factor in the maintenance and engineering costs and you’ll start to see that these fees are passed on to the customers. As with all service providers, there are price variations between airlines for in-flight connectivity, with some (like Emirates) offering the first 10MB free as a trial.

So if we’re paying over the odds for Wi-Fi, will it get faster in the future?

Yes, they’re working on it. The European Aviation Network [EAN] is being developed by communications firm Inmarsat and Deutsche Telekom. This will be a high-capacity satellite Wi-Fi network backed up by ground towers, promising to provide “a reliable high bandwidth broadband service in the air” throughout Europe. The EAN is on track for launch this year (more information here https://www.inmarsataviation.com/en/services/european-aviation-network/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-european-aviation-network.html )

By 2020, inflight Wi-Fi is set to be a billion-dollar revenue sector with over half of the world’s aircraft being equipped for inflight Wi-Fi within a matter of years.

Gogo, with a network that covers the whole country, currently monopolises US in-flight Wi-Fi. Despite it being criticised for slow download and upload speeds, it promises that its new 2Ku service will deliver up to 70 Mbps due to upgraded antennas and satellite services. Almost double the average connection you see on land!

We haven’t seen this in Europe yet as the connection to satellites has been patchy due to dense airspace. However, with the imminent launch of the EAN and their launch client IAG (who own British Airways) Europe will start to see Wi-Fi onboard short haul flights as soon as this Summer.

Unfortunately though, Britain’s budget airlines are less likely to be offering this service anytime soon, with Ryanair’s spokesman going as far as saying that their customers enjoy being off the radar and out of contact during their flight.

So you might get away with the ‘Sorry I was on a plane!’ excuse for a bit longer…

 

With thanks to luxuryactivist.com for the image.
PART 2 – GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION (GDPR): THE REQUIREMENTS, DEADLINES AND FACTS

What will happen if my company is not compliant with the GDPR?

Perhaps the biggest question companies are asking themselves regarding this. Non-compliance with the GDPR faces penalties of up to €20 million or 4 percent of global annual turnover, whichever is higher. Ovum reports that 52% of companies believe that they will be fined for non-compliance. It’s also been predicted by Oliver Wyman (management consulting firm) that the European Union could collect as much as $6 billion in fines and penalties in the first year.

You likely won’t be the only one if your organisation is not in compliance by May 25th. The general consensus is that about half of the U.S. companies that should be compliant will not be on all requirements. Solix Technologies released a survey in December where 22% of companies were not even aware that they must comply with GDPR. Furthermore, 38% said that the personal data they process is not protected from misuse and unauthorised access at every stage of its life cycle.

One requirement is looking to be particularly difficult for companies trying to gain compliance – The right to be forgotten. Almost two-thirds of the Solix survey respondents say they are unsure if they can get rid an individual’s personal information forever by the May deadline. This leaves many organisations vulnerable to facing fines.

 

How will penalties be assessed?

This is the big unanswered question. Will there be a difference in fines between a breach that doesn’t have much impact on an individual compared with one where their exposed personal identity information causes damage? And what will that difference be?

It’s thought that the regulators will want to make an example of a few companies to send out a message to those that are non-compliance. Following this, organisations can make a more accurate assessment of what to expect in the event of being found non-compliant.

 

Which GDPR requirements will my company be affected by?

Following GDPR requirements will mean companies need to change the way they process, store, and protect customers’ personal data. For example, when an individual consents, companies will be permitted to store and process personal data, but for “no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the personal data are processed.” Personal data must also be portable from one company to another, and companies must erase personal data upon request.

That last item is also known as the right to be forgotten, for which there are some exceptions. There are some legal requirements that supersede the GDPR and mean that an organisation may maintain certain data, for example, HIPAA health record requirements.

Although the term “reasonable” has not been well defined by the GDPR, company security teams must be able to provide a “reasonable” level of privacy and data protection to citizens of the EU.

A potentially challenging requirement is the rule around breach reporting. Following detection of a data breach, companies must report it within 72 hours to supervisory authorities and individuals affected.

Performing impact assessments to identify vulnerabilities and how to address them is another requirement, with the intention of helping to mitigate the risk of breaches.

 

Successful GDPR – A Case Study

Let’s take ADP as an example. This is a company that provides Human Capital Management via a cloud based system as well as business outsourcing services to more than 650,000 companies around the globe. That’s millions of people around the world that it holds personal identity information for So it’s hard to imagine a company that could be more affected by the GDPR. It’s not just regulators that will expect them to be compliant, but all of their clients as well, as if these clients are to be compliant, then ADP needs to be first. If ADP were to be found as non-compliant then it would not only face hefty fines, but potentially a huge loss of business as well.

The scale and global focus of ADP holds it in good stead and gives them an advantage when facing the regulations surround the GDPR. There won’t be a huge leap to adhere to these as they already adhere to so many privacy laws and security regulations. They are certainly not starting from scratch. There need for compliance is not just as a company, but as a service provider too.

ADP may well be better prepared than most, but it is still a large and global project which they began a year ago. Before GDPR had been discussed, they had already started working on data flow mapping and privacy assessments as a part of new products.

This is what they see as the key for successful compliance – The early onset of data flow mapping. “Data flow mapping is required to do inventory of products, and processing PII is a first step to data protection impact assessments that are required. We’ve also implemented privacy by design in our new offers and products.” ADP even provides training for its developers to support its “privacy by design” policy.

Another step towards success is pulling in people from many areas of the company. This project of complying with the GDPR is something that the whole organisation needs to be involved with. It affects all the operations, and the functional groups, not just a pure privacy or compliance project for the security teams. The right processes need to be implemented across the organisation as a whole.

One mechanisms for securing PII is encryption, which is something that ADP already have in place. Security wise, this is something that can then be communicated to their clients and then onto their employees and clients of their own.

ADP are very clear that they will be compliant and on time. They are a data processor for other companies, so this compliance is something they are making clear to their clients. They want to protect their personal data to the standard expected by the EU regulator, and thus, have applied for binding corporate rules for protecting personal identity data.

Setting a rather good example of where to start and what to do, here are ADP’s tips on beginning the GDPR compliance journey:

  • As a company, understand what it means for you in terms of your business. Identify to what extent you will be affected by the new regulations and compile a gap analysis.
  • Take an operational approach. Take each function of your organisation, and have a representative from each. This is not just a purely legal or privacy compliance project. Each organisational function representative can determine whether a requirement affects their department, and how they can or already do meet this requirement.
  • Documentation. Part of the GDPR is being able to show how you have become compliant. Get your business people to do an assessment, decide what needs to be done, and then document what you are doing.

 

What should my company be doing to prepare for the GDPR?

  • Get top management to set a sense of urgency. You must be prepared.
  • Get all stakeholders involved. Get a task force in place that includes marketing, finance, sales, operations—any function within the organization that collects, analyses, or otherwise makes use of customers’ personal identity information. Information will be shared better, and will be most useful to those implementing the technical and procedural changes that the GDPR requires. Each individual team will also be better prepared to deal with any impact on them.
  • Conduct a risk assessment: One of the biggest obstacles but the first course of action – you need to know what data you store and process on EU citizens and understand the risks surrounding this. This risk assessment must also outline the measures being taken to mitigate that risk. A key element of this assessment will be to uncover all shadow IT that might be collecting and storing PII. The greatest risk for non-compliance is from shadow IT and smaller point solutions – Don’t ignore them!
  • Hire or appoint a Data Protection Officer: This could be someone that already holds a similar role to this position, as long as there is no conflict of interest in terms of ensuring personal identify information protection. If there is no one then you will need to hire a DPO. This could be a ‘virtual’ consultative role rather than a full time position.
  • Create a data protection plan: This is something that most companies already have in place. You will need to review and update it with the GDPR in mind, to ensure that it complies with requirements.
  • Don’t forget about mobile: According to a survey, 64% of IT and security executives access customer, partner, and employee PII using mobile devices. 81 percent of the survey respondents said that employees were allowed to install personal apps on these mobile devices. In terms of GDPR compliance, this creates a unique set of risks – If any of those apps access and store PII, they must do so in a GDPR-compliant manner which is very difficult to control, especially when you consider that employees will use unauthorized apps too.
  • Create a plan to report your GDPR compliance progress: As the May deadline gets closer, organisations must be able to demonstrate how they are making progress with the new regulations by completing the Record of Processing Activities (RoPA). This centres around taking an inventory of risky applications. This will help you avoid being an easy target for regulators. Through doing this RoPA you are identifying where personal data is being processed, who is processing it and how it is being processed.
  • Implement measures to mitigate risk: So you’ve identified the risks and how to mitigate them, next you need to put those measures into place. Following the RoPA, your GDPR team can identify and investigate any potential data risks and determine the level of security required to protect that data.
  • Ask for help. If you have a small organisation then don’t be afraid to ask for help if needed. Smaller companies can and will still be affected by GDPR, some more than others. If you don’t have the resources needed to meet requirements then there are outside resources available to provide advice and technical expertise to help you through this process.
  • Test incident response plans: Companies have 72 hours to report a data breach. Your response teams need to know how to respond and report a breach – Their ability to do this effectively will influence your company’s risk of fines. Do a test and practice this process.
  • Set up a process for ongoing assessment: To ensure that you stay compliant, you will need to consistently monitor the processes you have in place and continuously improve them. You may wish to incentivise employees for following new policies, and hand out penalties for those that don’t. GDPR policy observances could even be added to employee contracts.

The aim of all of this is not merely to tick a box and comply for the sake of avoiding a fine. You can view this as a way of improving your business. Not only could compliance be seen as a competitive advantage, but it will also boost consumers confidence in your brand and service. In addition to this, and perhaps most importantly, the changes that will be made in order to comply with the GDPR will result in technical improvements, process efficiency and the effectiveness of how your organisation manages and secures data. All positive things!

 

With thanks to superoffice.com for the image.